A Simulation Integrated Investment Project Ranking and Selection Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11121/ijocta.01.2012.00105Keywords:
Project risk assessment, Investment project evaluation, Simulation, Ranking and SelectionAbstract
Enterprises are confronted with several project alternatives that they assume to gain revenue in the future, but their own economical resources are limited to carry out all alternatives. Therefore, a decision process arises to prioritize and select among alternatives according to the predetermined goals and criteria to reach the maximum utilization. On the other hand, in project evaluation, the values of project parameters are often assumed to be known with complete certainty. However, project parameters normally change during a life cycle of the project, and it is necessary to consider uncertainty and risk phenomena while evaluating projects. Simulation-based project evaluation approaches enable to make more reliable investment decision since they permit to include future uncertainty and risk in analysis process. In this article, a novel simulation-based optimal decision approach is proposed for evaluating and comparing investment projects under uncertain and/or risky environments. The phases of the proposed approach are; (a) developing the effectiveness measure formulation of a project, (b) identifying and checking all controllable project parameters that affect the measure, (c) developing simulation model for the measure, and (d) performing the project ranking and selection procedures in order to rank and select the projects. Three ranking and selection procedures, previously used for comparing performances of the different production/service systems, are embedded in the proposed approach.Downloads
References
P. Jovanovic, Application of sensitivity analysis in investment project evaluation under uncertainty and risk, International Journal of Project Management, 17, 217-222, 1999. CrossRef
Ö. Armaneri, G.Özdağoğlu, Ö. Yalçınkaya, Proje risk düzeyinin belirlenmesi için simülasyonu ve bulanık kümeler teorisini temel alan bütünleşik bir yaklaşım. Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology, 9, 2, 223-239, 2008 (in Turkish).
Ö. Armaneri, G.Özdağoğlu, Ö. Yalçınkaya, An Integrated Decision Support Approach for Project Investors in Risky and Uncertain Environments. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 234, 8, 2530-2542, 2010. CrossRef
L. Dimova, P. Sevastianov, D. Sevastianov, MCDM in a fuzzy setting: Investment projects assessment application, International Journal of Production Economics, 100, 10-29, 2006. CrossRef
A.B. Badiru, D.B. Sieger, Neural network as a simulation metamodel in economic analysis of risky projects, European Journal of Operational Research, 105, 130-142, 1998. CrossRef
A.L. Medaglia, S.B. Graves, J.L. Ringuest, A multiobjective evolutionary approach for linearly constrained project selection under uncertainty, European Journal of Operational Research, 179, 869-894, 2007. CrossRef
B. Rebiasz, Fuzziness and randomness in investment project risk appraisal, Computers & Operations Research, 34, 199-210, 2007. CrossRef
E. Borgonovo, L. Peccati, Uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis in the evaluation of investment projects, International Journal of Production Economics, 104, 62-73, 2006. CrossRef
E.E. Karsak, E. Tolga, Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making procedure for evaluating advanced manufacturing system investments, International Journal of Production Economics, 69, 49-64, 2001. CrossRef
S. Mohamed, A.K. McCowan, Modelling Project investment decisions under uncertainty using possibility theory, International Journal of Project Management, 19, 231-241, 2001. CrossRef
X. Huang, Optimal project selection with random fuzzy parameters, International Journal of Production Economics, 106, 513-522, 2007. CrossRef
G. Powers, J.Y. Ruwanpura, G. Dolhan, M. Chu, Simulation based project selection decision analysis tool, Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference, 1778-1785, 2002.
T.L. Saaty, L.G. Vargas, Models, Methods, Concepts & Applications of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, 34, Kluwer, Boston, 2000.
J.W. Lee, S.H. Kim, An integrated approach for independent information system project selection, International Journal of Project Management, 19, 111-118, 2001. CrossRef
J.Y. Teng, G.H. Tzeng, Transportation investment project selection using fuzzy multiobjective programming, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 96, 259-280, 1998. CrossRef
K.M.A. Al-Harbi, Application of the AHP in project management, International Journal of Project Management, 19, 19-27, 2001. CrossRef
M. Enea, T. Piazza, Project Selection by Constrained Fuzzy AHP, Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 3, 39-62, 2004. CrossRef
M. Oral, O. Kettani, Ü. Çınar, Project evaluation and selection in a network of collaboration: A consensual disaggregation multi-criterion approach, European Journal of Operational Research, 130, 332-346, 2001. CrossRef
R. Bellman, L. Zadeh, Decision making in a fuzzy environment, Management Science, 17, 141-164, 1971.
T.L. Saaty, Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process, Management Science, 32, 841-855, 1986. CrossRef
R.L. Keeney, H. Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs, Wiley, New York, 1976.
A.B. Badiru, P.S. Pulat, Comprehensive Project management: Integrating, Optimization Models, Management Principles and Computers, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1995.
J.L. Cochrane, M. Zeleny, Editors, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Univ. South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC, 1973.
M. Zeleney, Multiple Criteria Decision Making, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982.
C. Romero, A survey of generalized goal programming, European Journal Operations Research, 25, 183-191, 1986. CrossRef
R. Khorramshahgol, H. Azani, Y. Gousty, An integrated approach to project evaluation and selection, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 35, 265-270, 1988. CrossRef
A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper and R. O. Ferguson, Optimal estimation of executive compensation by linear programming, Management Science, 1, 2, 138-151, 1955. CrossRef
B. Aouni, O. Kettani, Goal programming model: A glorious history and a promise future, European Journal of Operational Research, 133, 225-231, 2001. CrossRef
M. Tamiz, D. Jones, C. Romero, Theory and Methodology: Goal programming for decision making: An overview of the current state-of-the-art, European Journal of Operational Research, 111, 569-581, 1998. CrossRef
R.E. Steuer, P. Na, Multiple criteria decision making combined with finance: A categorical bibliographic study, European Journal of Operational Research, 150, 496-515, 2003. CrossRef
E. Ammar, H.A. Khalifa, Characterization of optimal solutions of uncertainty investment problem, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 160, 111-124, 2005. CrossRef
W.J.H. Van Groenendaal, Estimating NPV variability for deterministic models, European Journal of Operational Research, 107, 2002-213, 1998. CrossRef
F. Lefley, The payback method of investment appraisal: a review and synthesis, International Journal of Production Economics, 44, 207-244, 1996. CrossRef
E. Borgonovo, L. Peccati, Sensitivity analysis in investment project evaluation, International Journal of Production Economics, 90, 17-25, 2004. CrossRef
F. Lefley, Approaches to risk and uncertainty in the appraisal of new technology capital projects, International Journal of Production Economics, 53, 21-33, 1997. CrossRef
A.M. Law, W.D. Kelton, Simulation Modeling & Analysis, McGraw-Hill, Inc., Singapore, 1991.
C.D. Pegden, R.E. Shannon, R.P. Sadowski, Introduction to Simulation Using SIMAN, McGraw-Hill, Inc., New Jersey, 1990.
D.R. Anderson, D.J. Sweeney, T.A. Williams, An Introduction to Management Science: Quantitative Approaches to Decision Making, 11th ed., Thomson South-Western, Ohio, 2005.
W.D. Kelton, R.P. Sadowski, D.A. Sadowski, Simulation with Arena. 1. Edition, McGraw-Hill Inc, New York, 1997.
S.L. Rosen, C.M. Harmonosky, M.T. Traband, A simulation optimization method that considers uncertainty and multiple performance measures, European Journal of Operational Research, 181, 315-330, 2007. CrossRef
J.R. McGuigan, R.C. Moyer, F.H. deB. Harris, Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategy, and Tactics, Ninth edition, South-Western, Ohio, 2002.
T. Merna, D.V. Storch, Risk management of an agricultural investment in a developing country utilising the CASPAR programme, International Journal of Project Management, 18, 349-360, 2000. CrossRef
C. Kahraman, D. Ruan, E. Tolga, Capital budgeting techniques using discounted fuzzy versus probabilistic cash flows, Information Sciences, 142, 57-76, 2002. CrossRef
E.R. Coates, M.E. Kuhl, Using simulation software to solve engineering economy problems, Computers&Industrial Engineering, 45, 285-294, 2003. CrossRef
Ö. Armaneri, Ö. Yalçınkaya, Evaluation of Risky Investment Projects through Simulation and Response Surface Methodology. Lectures on Modeling and Simulation, 7, 2, 21-30, 2006.
Ö. Armaneri, Ö. Yalçınkaya, Belirsiz ve Riskli Ortamlarda Yatırım Projelerinin Değerlendirilmesine Yönelik Benzetim Tabanlı Bir Yaklaşım, Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology-A Applied Sciences and Engineering, 11, 1, 1-16, 2010 (in Turkish).
C.S. Park, Contemporary Engineering Economics, Third Edition, Prentice-Hall, Inc, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2002.
H. Eski, Ö. Armaneri, Engineering Economics, Gazi Publishing, Ankara, 2006.
P.G. Keat, P.K.Y. Young, Managerial Economics: Economic Tools for Today’s Decision Makers, Third Edition, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 2000.
D. Dubois, H. Prade., Plenary Talk, Possibility Theory and its applications: a retrospective and prospective view- IRIT-CNRS, Toulouse, 2005.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Articles published in IJOCTA are made freely available online immediately upon publication, without subscription barriers to access. All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (click here to read the full-text legal code). This broad license was developed to facilitate open access to, and free use of, original works of all types. Applying this standard license to your work will ensure your right to make your work freely and openly available.
Under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles in IJOCTA, so long as the original authors and source are credited.
The readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.