A predator-prey model for the optimal control of fish harvesting through the imposition of a tax
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.11121/ijocta.2023.1218Abstract
This paper is devoted to the study of ecosystem based fisheries management. The model represents the interaction between prey and predator population with Holling II functional response consisting of different carrying capacities and constant intrinsic growth rates. We have considered the continuous harvesting of predator only. It is observed that if the intrinsic growth rate of predator population crosses a certain critical value, the system enters into Hopf bifurcation. Our observations indicate that tax, the management object in fisheries system play huge impacts on this system. The optimal harvesting policy is disposed by imposing a tax per unit of predator biomass. The optimal harvest strategy is determined using Pontryagin's maximum principle, which is subject to state equations and control limitations. The implications of tax are also examined. We have derived different bifurcations and global stability of the system. Finally, numerical simulations are used to back up the analytical results.
Downloads
References
Chaudhuri, K. (1988). Dynamic optimization of combined harvesting of a two-species fishery. Ecological Modelling, 41(1-2), 17-25.
Mukhopadhyay, A. Chattopadhyay, J. & Tapaswi, P.K. (1997). Selective harvesting in a two species fishery model. Ecological Modelling, 94, 243-253.
Kar, T.K. & Chaudhuri, K.S. (2003). On non-selective harvesting of two competing fish species in the presence of toxicity. Ecological Modelling, 161(1-2), 125-137.
Kramer, D. B. (2008). Adaptive harvesting in a multiple-species coral-reef food web. Ecology and Society, 13(1).
El Foutayeni, Y., & Khaladi, M. (2012(a)). A bio-economic model of fishery where prices depend on harvest. Journal of Advanced Modeling and Optimization, 14(3), 543-555.
Elfoutayeni, Y & Khaladi, M. (2012(b)). A generalized bio-economic model for competing multiple-fish populations where prices de- pend on harvest. Journal of Advanced Modeling and Optimization, 14(3), 531-542.
Wang, W. K. & Ewald, C.O. (2010). A stochastic differential fishery game for a two species fish population with ecological interaction. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(5), 844-857.
Skonhoft, A., Vestergaard, N. & Quaas, M. (2012). Optimal harvest in an age structured model with different fishing selectivity. Environmental and Resource Economics, 51(4), 525-544.
Diekert, F.K., Hjermann, D., Nævdal, E. & Stenseth, N.C. (2010). Spare the Young Fish: Optimal Harvesting Policies for North-East Arctic Cod. Environmental and Resource Economics, 47, 455-475.
Kar, T.K. & Chakraborty, K.S. (2010). Effort dynamics in a prey-predator model with harvesting. International Journal of Information and Systems Sciences, 6(3), 318-332.
Chen, Q. Mao, J. & Li, W. (2006). Stability analysis of harvesting strategies in a cellular automata based predator-prey model. Cellular Automata Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4173, 268-276.
Pal, D., Mahaptra, G.S. & Samanta, G.P. (2013). Optimal harvesting of prey–predator system with interval biological parameters: A bioeconomic model. Mathematical Biosciences, 241, 181-187.
Srinivas, M.N., Srinivas, M.A.S., Das, K. & Gazi, N.H. (2011). Prey predator fishery model with stage structure in two patchy ma- rine aquatic environment. Applied Mathematics, 2, 1405-1416.
Wuhaib, S.A., & Hasan, Y.A. (2013). Predator-prey interactions with harvesting of predator with prey in refuge. Communica- tions in Mathematical Biology and Neuroscience, 2013.
Huang, L., Cai, D., & Liu, W. (2021). Optimal tax policy of a one-predator–two-prey system with a marine protected area. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, 44(8), 6876-6895.
Ibrahim, M. (2021). Optimal harvesting of a predator-prey system with marine reserve. Scientific African, 14, e01048.
Sharma, A., Gupta, B., Dhar, J., Srivastava, S. K., & Sharma, P. (2021). Stability analysis and optimal impulsive harvesting for a delayed stage-structured self dependent two compartment commercial fishery model. International Journal of Dynamics and Control, 1-11.
Meng, X.Y., & Meng, F.L. (2021). Bifurcation analysis of a special delayed predator-prey model with herd behavior and prey harvesting. AIMS Mathematics, 6(6), 5695-5719.
Meng, X.Y., & Wu, Y.Q. (2018). Bifurcation and control in a singular phytoplankton-zooplankton-fish model with nonlinear fish harvesting and taxation. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 28(03), 1850042.
Meng, X.Y., Wu, Y.Q., & Li, J. (2020). Bifurcation analysis of a Singular Nutrient-plankton-fish model with taxation, protected zone and multiple delays. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 10(3), 391.
Juneja, N., & Agnihotri, K. (2018). Con- servation of a predator species in SIS prey-predator system using optimal taxation policy. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 116, 86-94.
Rani, R., Gakkhar, S., & Moussaoui, A. (2019). Dynamics of a fishery system in a patchy environment with nonlinear harvesting. Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences, 42(18), 7192-7209.
Upadhyay, R.K., Banerjee, M., Parshad, R. & Raw, S.N. (2011). Deterministic chaos ver- sus stochastic oscillation in a prey-predator-top predator model. Mathematical Modelling and Analysis, 16(3), 343-364.
Zhang, X., Xu, R. & Li, Z. (2011). Global stability of a three-species food-chain model with diffusion and nonlocal delays. Mathematical Modelling and Analysis, 16(3), 376-389.
Yavuz, M., & Sene, N. (2020). Stability analysis and numerical computation of the fractional predator–prey model with the harvesting rate. Fractal and Fractional, 4(3), 35.
Wang, Y. & Wang, H. (2014). Stability and selective harvesting of a phytoplankton- zooplankton system. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2014.
Kar, T.K. (2005). Conservation of a fishery through optimal taxation: a dynamic reaction model. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 10(2), 121-131.
Sharma, A.K., Sharma, A., & Agnihotri, K. (2015). Dynamical analysis of a harvesting model of phytoplankton-zooplankton interaction. International Journal of Mathematical and Computational Sciences, 8(6), 1013-1018.
Dubeya, B. Chandra, P. & Sinha, P. (2003). A model for fishery resource with reserve area. Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 4, 625-637.
Kar, T.K. (2006). Modelling and analysis of a harvested prey–predator system incorporating a prey refuge. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 185, 19-33.
Kar, T.K. & Chattopadhyay, S.K (2009). Bioeconomic modelling: an application to the north-east-atlantic cod fishery. Journal of Mathematics Research, 1(2), 164-178.
Pontryagin, L.S. (1987). Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes. CRC Press
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Anal Chatterjee, Samares Pal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles published in IJOCTA are made freely available online immediately upon publication, without subscription barriers to access. All articles published in this journal are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (click here to read the full-text legal code). This broad license was developed to facilitate open access to, and free use of, original works of all types. Applying this standard license to your work will ensure your right to make your work freely and openly available.
Under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, authors retain ownership of the copyright for their article, but authors allow anyone to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy articles in IJOCTA, so long as the original authors and source are credited.
The readers are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
- for any purpose, even commercially.
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.